-
De Botton and Hopper
Unfortunately, I do not know the painter Hopper, therefore it is harduous to express comments on his artworks. I do not remember Hopper when I studied art’s history at school. Perhaps, the school programs are focused on European art, while American painters and movements start emerging as from the II WW. Neither I happen to see his paintings in some museum or art exhibition.
From my point of view, Hopper is an original painter. He painted his canvas in the 10’s and 20’s, when new movements shook the art panorama: expressionism, cubism, surrealism, abstractism and so on.
I see why some critics call Hopper “kitsch”: although the fad of new movements, he stayed clinged to the painting as a figurative art. While all the painters in that period competed with new techniques (abstract and informal art), Hopper kept capturing the essence from people in their loneliness dimension. He swimmed against the tide? Yes, but that does not mean his art is kitsch or petty. And yet, I think that Hopper conveys well the human anguish after the I WW and the fall of the ancient world. He shows moments of aloneness, afar from the crowd, men and women depicted in their intimacy.
Log in to reply.