-
De Botton and Hopper
I mostly agree with De Botton’s point of view on Hopper’s art, but not in fully.
On the one hand I would say that De Botton achieves in expressing what lie underneath Hopper’s paintings: they show still moments of aloneness, afar from the crowd, men and women depicted in their intimacy, in their bareness made of flaws and disillusion.
On the other hand I don’t agree with De Botton’s title Pleasures of sadness. As he wrote Hopper’s art is not provoking a sense of sadness in us, as though his paintings are all about isolation and loneliness.
Nonethless I find Hopper mercilessly relentless in his truthful representation of the american society: there’s an unforgiving sense of void conveyed by the backdops of his paintings, like they were mirrors of the inner isolation that the people portraited are experiencing.
They are a plain, non-judgemental representations of this state of being and in this Hopper maybe can be realistic, though I can feel through his images a sort of hopeless stillness subtly despairing of something good out there.
That said I must admit that I like his paintings very much, in my opinion noone has been able to put on canvas this imagery about alienating solitudes like he has done, albeit I would not be comfortable in having one of them hanging up on one of my walls.
Log in to reply.